I was trying to figure out how long I have been blogging in one form or another (for a certain reason) and saw this post I put up on an old blog on July 15th, 2009. I thought I would repost it, and put it out there for you all (might seem kind of ridiculous now, but it was what I thought then (ps my very first ever blog post was on May 2, 2005):
A friend put up a post I want to copy here from Gordon Fee that he titles “a word of advice to bibliobloggers”:
-Gordon Fee, Listening to the Spirit in the Text, (Eerdmanns, Grand Rapids, MI, 2000, p.11)
Here is a question I have:
Now, I know this is not always the case but I wonder if it could be the case for some people in some instances? Could some be more interested in knowledge of the Bible and it’s teachings than necessarily the One to whom the Bible points?
I would assert that, yes, some are more interested in knoweldge of the Bible for it’s own sake and that for them the task of exegesis is not a spiritual one by any means but a strictly historical or literary one and so therefore it does not lead them to a deeper worship and or a more intimate knoweldge of the Holy One.
So for these, yes, exegesis is a kind of idolatry