IF you need an example of how NOT to do it – read this. I find this approach not one that I could recommend. I think maybe it has noble intentions as there is great need in the world for better resources for pastors and teachers in less developed areas of the world and especially in the global south where the church is growing faster then it can keep up with. At the same time I think it somewhat misrepresents what theological education and “training for the ministry” is supposed to be about. And perhaps unwittingly devalues the staunch realities and problems AND pain of true famines from which real people suffer. It basically turns its back on the poor, the suffering, the oppressed.
As I see it, it is based on false juxtapositon of physical hunger and spiritual hunger. They are not mirrors of each other. They are worlds apart. Many in the Western world are a far cry from true physical hunger and yet ALL human beings, rich or poor, free or slave, white or non-white are spiritually depraved and in desperate need of a SAVIOR. It trivializes real hunger, real poverty, real suffering.
I think it reveals some ignorance (either they just don’t understand don’t know or are just not paying attention to it) of larger missiological contextual issues that are face in cross-cultural work. It is a imposition of Western values on to other cultures which is a big big no-no in cross-cultural missions. It reveals ignorance of the changing role of Westerners in world missions and or evangelization. While there are plenty of places where westerns can be and are quite effective in evangelizing the lost where the national might be less effective (for a whole host of issues and reasons) the increasing responsibility of the Western Missionary is that of PARTNERSHIP, a coming along side nationals to reach the lost and to teach, tran, equip men and women for teaching/preaching roles in their own contexts. The end goal of mission is not transference of one set of cultural values to another, it is TRANSFORMATION of the target culture to the glory of God. I think it is not a good way to go about it and in my personal opinion, it would be best not to support this movement either financially, emotionally or any other sort.
It is true, there is a DERTH of theological and or ministerial resources for pastors, teachers, and leaders in the now dominant Christian world. They are really truly asking for and desiring materials for them to tach and train folks in the Word to be sure the Bible is being well understood and followed and adhered to in their own contexts. But see even that raises issues as to the idea that they are looking to us for resources because (and I happen to have just enough world experience to know) they see us as successful and good and blessed by God so they want to learn from us and to emulate us.
Instead I think it would be good to help the best we can but not from the point of view of “theological famine” necessarily but in partnership in obedience to the great co-mission. Partnering with them to teach and train their own people and maybe even from their own cultural perspectives – seems to me like a kind of theological colonialism to think we should go there and train them from our view so we know they are getting it right.
This is why I am a HUGE advocate for promoting Inductive Bible Study and that in a community context much like what we see in Mike and Tim’s book: People of the Book: Inviting Communities into Biblical Interpretation (Wipf and Stock). That way we are working best to not IMPOSE our theology on them, but instead EQUIPPING them to study the Bible and draw their own conclusions in a way that is faithful to the Bibilcal text. That way, we could learn something too! 🙂
Well I think that is enough of that!