Horton’s New Theology on sale til Jan 27th!!

Michael Horton’s new systematic theology Christian Faith: A Systematic Theology for Pilgrims on the Way (Zondervan 2011) is on a big sale for the next week.  If you are looking for a new systematic theology – now is the time.  It’s normally going to be $45 – $50!!  Right now, it is just under $30.  Strike while the iron is hot.

NOTE from WTS Books: Due to overwhelming demand, we and the publisher are out of stock of this title. While we will honor the promotional price through January 27th, your entire order may be delayed until late February if you include this title. We apologize for any inconvenience that this might cause you.

Publisher’s Description:

The most important systematic theology since Louis Berkhof’s 1932 magum opus. Interacting with movements within the Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox traditions, award-winning scholar Horton offers a brief synopsis of biblical passages that inform a particular doctrine; and surveys current and past works with contemporary emphasis on exegetical, philosophical, practical, and theological questions.  Includes an extensive bibliography.

The Christian Faith is written for a growing cast of pilgrims making their way together and will be especially welcomed by professors, pastors, students, and armchair theologians. Its features include: (1) a brief synopsis of biblical passages that inform a particular doctrine; (2) surveys of past and current theologies with contemporary emphasis on exegetical, philosophical, practical, and theological questions; (3) substantial interaction with various Christian movements within the Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox traditions, as well as the hermeneutical issues raised by postmodernity; and (4) charts, sidebars, questions for discussion, and an extensive bibliography, divided into different entry levels and topics.

960 pages
Published January 2011

Wow!!  The most important systematic theology since Louis Berkhof’s 1932 magum opus??!! Is that not a bold and exciting claim? 

Go here to see a video clip promo for the book.

Book Review: T.F. Torrance’s Incarnation

It is with much thanks to Adrianna Wright of IVP for her graciousness in allowing me to read (in part) and review T.F. Torrance’s Incarnation: The Person and Life of Christ (IVP, 2008).

This is a long overdue review (over a year) and for that I sincerely apologize.   I have to say at the out set I have not yet read this book in its entirety so there is just no possible way I can offer a full and complete review – so it will only at best be an inadequate partial review – why have I not read the whole thing? Well, its a big book from a theological standpoint.  It’s not light reading by any means, so though it is only 371 pages including endnotes, appendices, index and so on, there is a lot to read and chew on. It’s going to take me a while to really get through it – so instead of delaying I am writing a partial review.

In this book on Christology, Torrance “addresses both the heart and head through a deeply biblical, unified, Christ-centered and trinitarian theology.”  He “presents a full account of the meaning and significance of the life and person of Jesus Christ, demonstrating that his work of revelation and reconciliation can only be understood in the light of who he is – true God and true man united in one person.”    Torrance contends that the whole life of Jesus Christ from his birth through to his resurrection and ascension, even to his second coming are of saving significance.  (quotes from the inside cover).

One question I want to address is what is the value or purpose of reading such a deeply theological work such as Torrance or even Barth and others for the pastor and preacher? The primary value lies in nature and purpose of church dogmatics.  The editor writes “Christian dogmatics is that discipline which which attempts to express the essential content of Christian faith and doctrine as an aid to the church in her teaching and preaching” (xxii).  In sum, the purpose of reading this particular work on Christology or even a work like Barth’s Dogmatics (even if one does not agree with all the finer points being discussed), is it allows the preacher to proclaim Christ and the Scriptures in a richer and deeper way.

Essentially, it adds theological depth to the sermon or teaching.

You want to be a strong pastor/theologian?  Read Torrance, Barth and the like!  🙂

Both Torrance and Barth (Torrance was for a time, a student of Barth) sought to put forth a dogmatics of Christian Theology for the help of the pastor so he or she could faithfully proclaim the Scriptures in an articulate and unified way that was line with faithful interpretation, historical Christian teaching including the Fathers (“all the saints” xxiii) thus proclaiming Christ and bringing glory to him.

Some of the leading features of Torrance’s theology are as follows:

The heart of Torrance’s theology is the Trinity and deity of Christ…. The truth of the Trinity, ‘more to be adorned than expressed,’ and the deity of Christ belong together (xxx-xxxi).

The deity of Christ is the guarantee of reconciliation.  Because Jesus Christ is God, he not only makes God known, but what he does is the work of God.  The words and acts of Jesus and of the Father are identical.  The deity of Jesus is therefore the guarantee that the reconciliation we see and receive in his the reconciliation of God himself (xxxi).

The full humanity of Christ is of equal importance with his deity.  If Jesus is not God then it is not God that has saved us, but equally, if Jesus is not man then man has not been saved.  The deity and the humanity of Jesus are equally important and neither without the other can bring salvation (xxxii).

The humanity of Jesus is the guarantee of human reconciliation and forgiveness.  In fact, the very act of incarnation is an act of reconciliation because now in the person of Jesus Christ, there is a permanent union of God and man (an act of reconciliation or re-union) (xxxiv).

The hypostatic union of God and man in the one person of Christ needs to be understood dynamically – not statically.  It needs to include the whole life of Jesus from his birth through to his resurrection.  This ‘hypostatic union’ had to be maintained throughout the life of Jesus not just at his birth.  “Throughout it all, the hypostatic union held fast as Jesus clung to the Father in utter and obedient dependence in prayer.  And the hypostatic union emerged victorious and unscathed in the resurrection as the eternal union of God and man in Christ Jesus” (xxxvi).

The hypostatic union is at the heart of the gospel.  “The doctrine of the union of God and man in Christ is the absolute heart of the gospel.  it tells us that the full reality of God in his love has come all the way to suffering and sinful humanity and has united himself with us. It tells us that we have been accepted in the fullness of our humanity and brought as we are into union with him in Christ. It tells us that because Christ is the permanent union of God and man, his person is the indivisible and living center of our salvation for all time”   (xxxvi).

There is much much more to this work than can possibly be reviewed here – so this will have to suffice!  I highly recommend this as a work for pastors to read and consume and integrate into their thinking and theology and preaching/teaching ministry.

the fundamental attribute of God

What would you say is the fundamental attribute of God (attribute being an aspect of his character and person)?

I think historically it has been God’s holiness.  Not a few theologians have thought this to be the case, especially given Isa 6:3 and Rev 4:8.  Note that the angels did not sing “good good good” or “gracious gracious gracious” or “peace, peace, peace” is the Lord God Almighty..”

But I was reading through my copy of Stanely Grenz’ Theology for the Community of God (Eerdmans, 1994) and he notes the fundamental attribute of God as his love.  He writes:

GrenzIn that God is love apart from the creation of the world, love characterizes God.  Love is the eternal essense of the one God.  But this means that trinitarian love is not merely one attribute of God among many.  Rather, love is the fundamental “attribute” of God.  “God is love,” is the foundational ontological statement we can declare concerning the divine essence.  God is foundationally the mutuality of the love relationship beween the Father and Son, and this personal love is the Holy Spirit.”

Because throughout eternity and apart from the world the one God is love, the God who is love cannot but respond to the world in accordance to his own eternal essence, which is love.  Thus, this essential characteristic of God likewise describes the way God interacts with his world.  “Love,” therefore, is not only the description of he ternal God himself, it is likewise the fundamental characteristic of God in relationship with creation (72).

He goes on to note attempts to put God’s holiness as a primary attribute were to defend his wrath and judgement – but to be honest, I didn’t necessarily see it that way.  I tend to think that the holiness of God highlights his transcendance over and above the world and his separateness from it than it does emphasize his wrath and judgement.  Therefore, because he is holy, in that he is separate from and above the things of the world – he is pure light and truth and love and so on.  But perhaps I am missing something? 

What say you?